首页> 外文OA文献 >Laboratory testing of extravascular body fluids in Croatia: a survey of the Working group for extravascular body fluids of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine
【2h】

Laboratory testing of extravascular body fluids in Croatia: a survey of the Working group for extravascular body fluids of the Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine

机译:克罗地亚的血管外液实验室测试:克罗地亚医学生物化学和检验医学会血管外液工作组的调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introduction: We hypothesized that extravascular body fluid (EBF) analysis in Croatia is not harmonized and aimed to investigate preanalytical, analytical and postanalytical procedures used in EBF analysis in order to identify key aspects that should be addressed in future harmonization attempts.Materials and methods: An anonymous online survey created to explore laboratory testing of EBF was sent to secondary, tertiary and private health care Medical Biochemistry Laboratories (MBLs) in Croatia. Statements were designed to address preanalytical, analytical and postanalytical procedures of cerebrospinal, pleural, peritoneal (ascites), pericardial, seminal, synovial, amniotic fluid and sweat. Participants were asked to declare the strength of agreement with proposed statements using a Likert scale. Mean scores for corresponding separate statements divided according to health care setting were calculated and compared.Results: The survey response rate was 0.64 (58 / 90). None of the participating private MBLs declared to analyse EBF. We report a mean score of 3.45 obtained for all statements evaluated. Deviations from desirable procedures were demonstrated in all EBF testing phases. Minor differences in procedures used for EBF analysis comparing secondary and tertiary health care MBLs were found. The lowest scores were obtained for statements regarding quality control procedures in EBF analysis, participation in proficiency testing programmes and provision of interpretative comments on EBF’s test reports.Conclusions: Although good laboratory EBF practice is present in Croatia, procedures for EBF analysis should be further harmonized to improve the quality of EBF testing and patient safety.
机译:简介:我们假设克罗地亚的血管外体液(EBF)分析不统一,旨在调查EBF分析中使用的分析前,分析和分析后程序,以便确定将来进行统一尝试时应解决的关键方面。为探索EBF的实验室测试而创建的匿名在线调查已发送至克罗地亚的二级,三级和私人医疗医学生物化学实验室(MBL)。声明旨在解决脑脊髓,胸膜,腹膜(腹水),心包,精液,滑膜,羊水和汗液的分析前,分析和分析后程序。要求参与者使用李克特量表来宣布与拟议陈述的同意强度。计算并比较了根据卫生保健设置划分的相应独立陈述的平均得分。结果:调查的回复率为0.64(58/90)。没有参与的私有MBL声明要分析EBF。我们报告的所有评估陈述平均得分为3.45。在所有EBF测试阶段都证明了与理想程序的偏差。发现在比较二级和三级医疗MBL的EBF分析中使用的程序存在微小差异。在有关EBF分析中的质量控制程序,参加能力验证计划以及对EBF的测试报告提供解释性注释方面的得分最低。结论:尽管克罗地亚存在良好的实验室EBF做法,但应进一步统一EBF分析程序以提高EBF测试的质量和患者安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号